what's the point

of me reviewing your paper, editing them, correcting them, inserting comments - when all you do is to "accept all changes" and ignore the comments, then forward them to all the authors for "comments before submission". and when someone points out the same things as I do, you forward me their commented version and ask me to make changes. I read their comments and
HELLO I HAVE ALREADY SAID EXACTLY THE SAME THINGS! JUST BECAUSE I DON'T HAVE A PHD/I WAS NOT INVOLVED IN THE EXPERIMENTS/I AM YOUR SUBORDINATE/I SUPPOSEDLY KNOW NOTHING DOESN'T MEAN THAT YOU CAN IGNORE MY COMMENTS AND THEN TELL ME TO MAKE CHANGES. THERE IS A REASON WHY I PUT THINGS IN COMMENTS... BECAUSE YOU, YES YOU, ARE SUPPOSED TO READ THEM AND DO THE CORRECTIONS YOURSELF. IT'S YOUR EXPERIMENT. IT'S YOUR PAPER. NOBODY ELSE KNOWS WHAT YOU ARE TRYING TO SAY, WHICH OF THE SETS OF CONFLICTING DATA IS CORRECT, WHERE YOU GOT YOUR EQUATION FROM. WHY SHOULD I "DO CORRECTIONS" TO YOUR PAPER AGAIN? YOU ARE PROBABLY GOING TO IGNORE MY COMMENTS AGAIN.

Once in a while I need to type in allcaps.